Manatt Sues Brown Rudnick Over Ex-Partner's Contingency Win
The case marks the second time in last five years that a lateral move involving D.C. litigator Benjamin Chew has led to headaches.
March 18, 2019 at 03:56 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Manatt Phelps & Phillips has sued Brown Rudnick in Washington, D.C., Superior Court, demanding what it claims is its rightful share of a $10 million settlement in a contingency case handled by former litigation partner Benjamin Chew.
In a complaint filed earlier this month, Manatt asserts that it represented ex-client Rudolph Geist and his limited liability corporation, RJGLaw, from October 2016 through May 2018 in a breach of contract case in federal court in Maryland, Geist et al. v. Hispanic Information and Telecommunications Network Inc.
As part of the terms of the representation, RJG agreed to pay Manatt 30 percent of any recovery, according to the suit.
After Chew left Manatt's partnership in April 2018 to join Brown Rudnick, Geist followed him to his new firm and hired Brown Rudnick, dropping Manatt from the case, the suit says. When the case settled in November 2018 for $10 million, Manatt alleges, Chew's old firm was left out of the recovery—despite having won a key ruling in March that allowed the core breach of contract claim to move forward.
“Mr. Geist, a lawyer, knows that legal services are not provided for free, and he was involved in the negotiations of the method of payment to Manatt at the outset of the HITN Litigation,” Peter Axelrad, Manatt's counsel at Council, Baradel, Kosmerl & Nolan, wrote in the complaint. “Manatt is entitled to the benefit conferred upon Mr. Geist and RJG.”
Along with accusing Geist of breaching the initial contract, Manatt leveled claims of tortious interference and unjust enrichment against Brown Rudnick. The complaint alleges that Chew and Brown Rudnick received payment despite that “all the work that caused the settlement was performed by Manatt, prior to Manatt's dismissal.”
Chew, who is not named as a defendant in the suit, said Monday that he had not seen the complaint and would not comment on it.
The case isn't the first time a lateral move involving Chew has led to problems. In 2014, he was forced to leave Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman just months after joining that firm from Patton Boggs, due to a client conflict related to Patton Boggs' work for Chevron Corp. He joined Manatt the same year.
When he left Manatt for Brown Rudnick last spring, Chew said in a statement that he immediately began working on a significant matter with an unnamed client, adding that he was able to provide, “seamless, high-level service even as I was transitioning,” which he called, “rare and special.”
According to Brown Rudnick, Chew's clientele has included the governments of Dubai, Ecuador, Honduras, and Nicaragua, defense contractors, software companies and celebrities including Cher and Johnny Depp.
An initial scheduling conference in the case is set for June 7.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHunter Biden Sues Fox, Ex-Chief Legal Officer Over Mock Trial Series
Disbarred NJ Attorneys Can Seek Reinstatement, Marking Shift in Decades-Old Policy
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2GlaxoSmithKline Settles Most Zantac Lawsuits for $2.2B
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 5Partner Cuts: The Grim Reality of Post-Merger Integration
Who Got The Work
Eleanor M. Lackman of Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp has entered an appearance for Canon, the Japanese camera maker, and the Brooklyn Nets in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed Sept. 16 in California Central District Court by T-Rex Law on behalf of technology company Phinge Corporation, pursues claims against the defendants for their ongoing use of the 'Netaverse' mark. The suit contends that the defendants' use of the mark in connection with a virtual reality platform will likely create consumer confusion. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall, is 2:24-cv-07917, Phinge Corporation v. Yankees Entertainment and Sports Network, LLC et al.
Who Got The Work
Fox Rothschild partner Glenn S. Grindlinger has entered an appearance for Garage Management Company in a pending lawsuit over alleged wage-and-hour violations. The case was filed Aug. 31 in New York Southern District Court by the Abdul Hassan Law Group on behalf of a manual worker who contends that he was not properly compensated for overtime hours worked. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres, is 1:24-cv-06610, Bailey v. Garage Management Company LLC.
Who Got The Work
Veronica M. Keithley of Stoel Rives has entered an appearance for Husky Terminal and Stevedoring LLC in a pending environmental lawsuit. The suit, filed Aug. 12 in Washington Western District Court by Kampmeier & Knutsen on behalf of Communities for a Healthy Bay, seeks to declare that the defendant has violated the Clean Water Act by releasing stormwater discharges on Puget Sound and Commencement Bay. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Benjamin H. Settle, is 3:24-cv-05662, Communities for a Healthy Bay v. Husky Terminal and Stevedoring LLC.
Who Got The Work
Caroline Pignatelli of Cooley has entered an appearance for Cooley, partner Matt Hallinan, retired partner Michael Tu and a pair of Cooley associates in a pending fraud lawsuit related to the firm's representation of startup company Carbon IQ and founder Benjamin Cantey. The case, filed Sept. 26 in New Jersey District Court by the DalCortivo Law Offices on behalf of Gould Ventures and member Jason Gould, contends that the defendants deliberately or recklessly concealed critical information from the plaintiffs regarding fraud allegations against Cantey. Gould claims that he would not have accepted a position on Carbon IQ's board of directors or made a 2022 investment in the company if the fraud allegations had been disclosed. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Robert Kirsch, is 3:24-cv-09485, Gould Ventures, LLC et al v. Cooley, LLP et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom have stepped in to represent PDD Holdings, the operator of online marketplaces Pinduoduo and Temu, in a pending securities class action. The case, filed Sept. 30 in New York Eastern District Court by Labaton Keller Sucharow and VanOverbeke, Michaud & Timmony, contends that the defendants concealed information that rendered the growth of PDD unsustainable and posed substantial risks to PDD’s business, including merchant policies that made it unprofitable for vendors to do business on PDD platforms; malware issues on PDD applications; and PDD’s failure to implement effective compliance systems. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-06881, Macomb County Retiree Health Care Fund v. Pdd Holdings Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250