Higher Law: A Taxing Dispute in Pot Law | Shunned by Banks | RICO Case Fails | Plus: In the Weeds
Two issues continue to bedevil cannabis companies—and the vendors that serve those companies: the Internal Revenue Service and pot-wary banks. Plus: An Oregon judge dismissed a RICO case, and we've got your calendar of events. Welcome to Higher Law.
August 23, 2018 at 04:00 PM
7 minute read
Welcome to Higher Law, our weekly briefing on all things cannabis. I'm Cheryl Miller, reporting for Law.com from Sacramento, where I am unindicted and only conspiring to bring you the best and latest in marijuana law news.
This week we look at two issues that continue to bedevil companies—and the vendors that serve those companies—trying to thrive in state-regulated marijuana markets: the Internal Revenue Service and pot-wary banks. Advocates like to say marijuana prohibition is in its final days, but tell that to the licensed dispensary that still can't open a checking account or is considered a drug-trafficker by the federal Tax Man.
Scroll down to go In the Weeds, where we've got more cannabis litigation to report on from California and in Oregon, a judge has dismissed a racketeering complaint brought by neighbors against a grower.
Thanks as always for reading. Got a story idea or tip? Do you have the ultimate solutions to the industry's tax and banking challenges? Drop me a line at [email protected] or call 916-448-2935. Follow me on Twitter at @capitalaccounts.
The Taxing Problem of the IRS
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit continues to block Colorado dispensaries' efforts to get the IRS to treat them like any other business. Just last month, a three-judge panel in Alpenglow Botanicals v. United States of America held that a taxpayer does not have to be convicted of a drug crime for the IRS to revoke its ability to deduct marijuana business expenses.
The decision follows in the same vein of other circuit rulings—Standing Akimbo v. USA and Green Solution Retail v. USA—siding with the IRS and the agency's ability to seize records from and deny tax deductions to state-authorized marijuana operations. At issue is Section 280E of the Internal Revenue Code, which bars companies from deducting ordinary business expenses if the filer is found to be “trafficking” in Schedule 1 substances.
“In this industry we all keep coming back to the same things—banking and 280E,” said James Hunt, an attorney with Harris Bricken in Seattle.
So what should a state-legal marijuana business do? The father-son owners of Alpenglow Botanicals had to pay a combined $53,000 after the IRS said they had taken impermissible deductions.
Hunt says he never advises clients to ignore 280E when filing their returns, a reality he called “very, very hard” and “unfair.”
Alpenglow “is a serious roadblock to challenging 280E on your returns,” Hunt told me. “Going forward we're going to have to manage 280E … If you're in the cannabis business, I think the IRS has made its position very clear.”
The Colorado firm Thorburn Walker has asked the Tenth Circuit to reconsider the Alpenglow case. Name partner James Thorburn said he could not talk about the case but did not he was encouraged by the court ordering federal tax attorneys to respond to the rehearing request.
Shunned by Banks: Wells Fargo Edition
By now you've heard the story of Florida agricultural commissioner candidate Nikki Fried having her Wells Fargo & Co. bank account closed because she supports medical marijuana—legal in Florida—and her campaign accepts donations from industry lobbyists. On Wednesday the bank responded by saying, essentially, that its hands are tied.
“As a national bank that is federally regulated, Wells Fargo must comply with federal law on the topic of marijuana, even in instances where state laws may differ,” the company said in a statement. “Since federal law prohibits the sale and use of marijuana, national banks like Wells Fargo may not knowingly bank or provide services to marijuana businesses or for related activities.”
Fried isn't the only one having high-profile marijuana trouble. This week Washington state resident Tracy Camp said she was fired from her job at Bank of America because the company learned her husband grows and processes state-licensed marijuana. The bank also closed three of her personal credit cards, she said.
And in Missouri, a hemp-product retailer had her business account closed by Great Southern Bank because of “elevated risk” associated with a “marijuana-related business.” The bank was unpersuaded by Emily Christianson's arguments about the differences between hemp and the pscyhoactive components of marijuana..
I've written about lawyers with marijuana clients and cannabis-advocacy groups losing their bank accounts. This, however, seems like an unusual rash of bank closures, some for tenuous reasons. If you know what's going on here, drop me a line: [email protected].
>>> Meanwhile, in California, a bill that would have created a closed-loop banking system for marijuana businesses and their vendors died in committee last week. It's not clear why, although a legislative committee analysis said setting up the limited-charter bank could cost the state $2 million.
“This is a serious public safety issue that deserves swift resolution,” said the bill's author, Democratic state Sen. Bob Hertzberg. “We've got barrels of cash buried all over the state, businesses being ransacked, and it's clear the federal government won't act.”
In the Weeds
>> A federal judge in Oregon has dismissed a racketeering complaint brought by neighbors of a state-legal marijuana grow site. U.S. District Judge Michael McShane said the neighbors had not proven “a compensable property injury.” The lawsuit, brought under federal RICO statutes, was similar to a successful one brought by neighbors of a grow in Colorado. [Marijuana Business Daily]
>> Attorneys Henry Wykowski and William Panzer are representing plaintiffs in a putative class action filed in California's Calaveras County. Andrew Greer, CEO of Golden State Herb Inc. and the lead plaintiff, is seeking $16.3 million in returned taxes and fees that cannabis farmers paid before the rural county rescinded its commercial cannabis urgency ordinance. [Calaveras Enterprise]
>> Oregon attorney Amy Margolis has launched a business accelerator focused on female cannabis entrepreneurs. “As legalization happens across the country, we're seeing more traditional capital and people from more traditional businesses come into the space,” Margolis told Forbes. “But they're bringing with them the same problems. As we see this influx, we see women's access to capital decrease even more than what it was before.” [Forbes]
>> A California judge has blocked San Luis Obispo County from ripping out plants at a cannabis farm—at least for now. Superior Court Judge Barry LaBarbera denied a grower's request to set aside a code enforcement officer's finding that the grow violates the county's cultivation ban in the area, but suspended an abatement order pending additional briefing. Attorney Alan Karnow represents several dozen growers fighting to harvest their current crops before leaving the grow-ban area. [The Tribune] >> California firm Archer Norris, which has an active cannabis practice, will close its doors in October. In an announcement this week, the firm said its shareholders decided that “it did not make economic sense” to continue operating under the current structure. The firm has been involved in challenges to Calaveras County's cannabis ban. [The Recorder]
What's Next: the Calendar Stuff
Aug. 24-26: The 2018 U.S. Cannabis Conference & Expo takes place at the Hyatt Regency Miami hotel.
Aug. 27: The Washington Cannabusiness Association hosts an “open discussion” event with the Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board
Aug. 27: The filing deadline is at 5 p.m. PDT for submitting public comments on California's proposed final cannabis regulations. The Bureau of Cannabis Control will also be holding a public comment event that morning in Sacramento.
Aug. 28-29: The Cannabis Science Conference will be held in Portland, Oregon.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Ill. Class Action Claims Cannabis Companies Sell Products with Excessive THC Content
4 minute read
County Reps: Appeal Likely Following State Court's Sales Tax Ruling for Retail Marijuana
6 minute read
Illicit Marijuana Business Operator Is Ordered to Pay New York $9.5M

Judge Fast-Tracks Hemp Operators' Lawsuit Against New York
Trending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250