X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Resolving a long-simmering Fourth Amendment question, the U.S. Supreme Court on Friday ruled that law enforcement cannot obtain revealing cellphone data without a warrant.

The decision in Carpenter v. United States marks a win for privacy interests in the ongoing tug-of-war over data privacy in the digital age.

By a 5-4 vote, the justices said police must get a warrant when collecting so-called historical “CSLI”—cell-site location information—to assist in an unexceptional criminal investigation, but the authorities are not limited by the warrant requirement in an ongoing emergency, such as the need to pursue a fleeing suspect or protect individuals who are threatened with imminent harm.

Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. (Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ ALM)

Chief Justice John Robert Jr. wrote the majority opinion, asserting that “as technology has enhanced the government’s capacity to encroach upon areas normally guarded from inquisitive eyes, this court has sought to ‘assure[ ] preservation of that degree of privacy against government that existed when the Fourth Amendment was adopted.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

Tony Mauro

Tony Mauro, based in Washington, covers the U.S. Supreme Court. A lead writer for ALM's Supreme Court Brief, Tony focuses on the court's history and traditions, appellate advocacy and the SCOTUS cases that matter most to business litigators. Contact him at [email protected] On Twitter: @Tonymauro

More from this author

Marcia Coyle

Marcia Coyle, based in Washington, covers the U.S. Supreme Court. Contact her at [email protected]. On Twitter: @MarciaCoyle

More from this author

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

Defending Federal Criminal Cases: Attacking the Government's ProofBook

Equips defense attorneys with the legal arguments and tactics they can and should use to challenge the government's evidence at every stage of a criminal case.

Get More Information
 

The British Legal Awards 2021Event

Celebrating achievement, excellence, and innovation in the legal profession in the UK.

Get More Information
 

The American Lawyer Industry Awards 2021Event

Honoring outstanding legal achievements focused at the national level, largely around Big Law and in-house departments.

Get More Information
 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.