Slaughter and May's Carillion advice and fees under scrutiny in government inquiry into collapse
Firm asked to provide details of fees and whether fees were "contingent on certain outcomes"
February 15, 2018 at 11:33 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Slaughter and May's advice to Carillion has been called into question, in the inquiry looking into the circumstances surrounding the construction company's collapse.
The parliamentary inquiry into the collapse has written to the magic circle firm to request information relating to the "nature of the advice" it provided to Carillion and the "period over which Slaughter and May provided that advice".
The request comes in response to comments made by former Carillion chairman Philip Green, who told the inquiry that as a result of his experience as managing director of wallpaper company Coloroll, which collapsed in 1990, he had always sought "quality advice", adding: "We took advice every step of the way."
Green said: "We sought very strongly at Carillion to make sure that we had quality advice, whether it was Slaughter and May as our lawyers, Lazard as our bankers or Morgan Stanley as our brokers. We believed we had high-quality advice in the Carillion situation… Those advisers were involved with us, intimately, throughout the last 12 or 18 months."
Slaughters has been asked whether it agrees with Green's assessment of its involvement and whether the firm agrees that its advice was acted upon.
The firm has also been asked for details of fees charged, whether the fees were "contingent on certain outcomes", and whether the advice provided by the firm was acted upon by Carillion.
The joint inquiry was set up by the Work and Pensions and Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy committees, following the collapse of the company in January. It is chaired by Frank Field MP and Rachel Reeves MP, both of whom are signatories on the letter, and is investigating "how a company that was signed off by KPMG as a going concern in Spring 2017 could crash into liquidation with a reported £5bn of liabilities and just £29m left in cash less than a year later".
The firm has until 20 February to respond to the request for information.
Slaughters has a longstanding relationship with Carillion and is among a raft of firms advising on the fallout from the collapse.
A Slaughters spokesperson said: "We confirm we have received a letter from the Chairs of the Work and Pensions Committee and the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee, asking us to answer some questions regarding our work for Carillion, to which we will of course respond."
Yesterday, it was announced that Clifford Chance had purchased Carillion Advice Services – the construction company's Newcastle-based legal services arm.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTopping Kirkland, Weil Won the Most Valuable Major Bankruptcy Retentions of 2024
Beyond Bordeaux’s Bankruptcy: A Lesson In Adapting to the Evolving Sports Media Landscape
6 minute readUS Judge Throws Out Sale of Infowars to The Onion. But That's Not the End of the Road for Sandy Hook Families
4 minute readCleary vs. White & Case: NY Showdown Over $5 Billion Brazilian Bankruptcy
Trending Stories
- 1Texas-Based Ferguson Braswell Expands in California With 6-Lawyer Team From Orange County Law Firm
- 2Hello, Greenberg: Key Player Returns to Big Law
- 3On the Move and After Hours: Einhorn Barbarito; Hartmann Doherty; Lowenstein Sandler; Lindabury McCormick
- 4Appellate Division Tosses Challenge to Rutgers Board Members That Ensnared NJ Lawyer
- 5Supreme Court Will Hear Religious Parents' Bid to Opt Out of LGBTQ-Themed School Books
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250