A former New York City administrative law judge’s claims against the city’s consumer affairs department, that she was subjected to sexual harassment and retaliated against for complaining about it, will go forward, a state appeals court has ruled.

She will also be allowed to add an alternative First Amendment retaliation claim rooted in allegations that she suffered unfair treatment for publicly raising concerns about agency directors pressuring her and other judges to resolve cases in the agency’s favor, the court decided.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]