X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Yahoo corporate headquarters

SAN JOSE — A lawyer representing two former male Yahoo Inc. employees faced a string of skeptical questions Wednesday afternoon from the judge overseeing his clients’ gender discrimination case.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

Ross Todd

Ross Todd is bureau chief of The Recorder in San Francisco. He writes about litigation in the Bay Area and around California. Contact Ross at rtodd@alm.com. On Twitter: @Ross_Todd.

More from this author

Law Firms Mentioned

[caption id="attachment_1413" align="alignnone" width="616"]<img class="size-full wp-image-1413" src="http://www.almcms.com/contrib

  • Morgan Lewis Bockius

/uploads/sites/403/2017/10/Yahoo-Article-201710092322.jpg" alt="" width="616" height="372" /> Yahoo corporate headquarters[/caption] SAN JOSE ��� A lawyer representing two former male Yahoo Inc. employees faced a string of skeptical questions Wednesday afternoon from the judge overseeing his clients <a href="http://www.therecorder.com/id=1202800060673/3-Things-to-Watch-as-Yahoo-Fights-Male-Employees-Gender-Discrimination-Suit?mcode=1202617583589&amp;curindex=8&amp;curpage=ALL" target="_blank">gender discrimination case</a>. Palo Alto-based attorney Jon Parsons claims that his clients���<a href="http://www.corpcounsel.com/id=1202749085844#comments" target="_blank">Gregory Anderson</a> and <a href="http://www.corpcounsel.com/id=1202769581629" target="_blank">Scott Ard</a>���were pushed out of the company by female managers who went too far to promote and hire women. He���s also argued that Yahoo���s forced ranking system, designed to push out low performers and managers who didn���t add sufficient value��to the company, was a��pretense to conduct mass layoffs in violation of state and federal laws designed to protect workers. At a hearing on Yahoo���s motion for summary judgment in the case, Parsons honed in on Yahoo���s quarterly review process, where employees performance scores were often ���recalibrated��� by upper-level managers who had little or no direct contact with them. ���What we have is a practice of men���s scores being reduced while women���s scores were not��� by women in upper management, Parsons said. ���The proper process, we would submit, is that the managers who know what their employees are doing should evaluate the employees.��� But U.S. Magistrate Judge Nathanael Cousins, who is overseeing the case, suggested that allowing the review of a single manager to determine the value of an employee could be potentially more troublesome, as could a system that foregoes reviews altogether. Cousins asked: ���Is the alternative potential more discriminatory and more unfair?��� Cousins also��prodded Parson to point��to evidence��that showed that his clients werent the poor performers that their Yahoo reviews made them out to be. "What tells me that their assessment was wrong?" the judge asked. The case has moved to the summary judgment phase just as��a broader discussion��about gender��diversity in��Silicon Valley has reached a boiling point,��after a <a href="http://www.nationallawjournal.com/id=1202795139409/Google-Engineers-Viral-Memo-Sparks-Legal-Questions">Google engineers memo</a> arguing that women are biologically less adept at technology��led to his termination. Yahoo, represented by a team at Morgan, Lewis &amp; Bockius led by labor and employment partner Melinda Riechert, has pushed back against Parsons��� narrative and defended Yahoo���s review system. ���If you just have one person giving the score, and there���s no review of the score, that allows more discrimination to take place than a score given by a whole team of managers with��� human resources officials overseeing the process, she said. Yahoo claims that Anderson was fired because of consistently lower quarterly performance review scores, which put him in the bottom 5 percent of the entire company, and low scores from his subordinates in bottom-up reviews. Ard, the company argues, was let go because his manager found that he didn���t add enough value to his team, especially given his senior level. But on Wednesday, Parsons argued that Anderson���s score was artificially manipulated downward and that Ard was pushed out shortly after he complained about changes that resulted in male employees below him having their review scores reduced. Parsons also argued that Yahoo manipulated its review process to make layoffs look like merit-based job cuts in order to avoid triggering obligations under the state and federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (WARN) laws,�� which require notice and benefits for workers affected by economic cuts. ���If the court allows a company like Yahoo to manipulate these numbers and create terminations ���for cause,��� " Parsons said, ���then the WARN Act becomes a toothless device.��� Cousins held off on ruling and said that he would issue a written opinion after reviewing the matter and reading the deposition transcript of former CEO Marisa Mayer, which Yahoo is seeking to keep under seal. Both Parsons and Riechert declined to comment beyond their remarks to the judge. <

  • Morgan Lewis Bockius

>
 

Corporate Governance: Avoiding and Responding to MisconductBook

For anyone who has been dealing with both the intended and unintended consequences of Dodd-Frank, Sarbanes-Oxley and other new laws and regulations, Corporate Go...

Get More Information
 

America's Claims Executive (ACE) 2020Event

ACE Leadership Forum & Expo is the annual conference for Senior Claims Executives in Insurance organizations.

Get More Information
 

Banking Litigation & Regulation Forum 2020Event

Delivers the key insights and practical solutions to acutely address the complex minefield of UK banking litigation & regulation.

Get More Information
 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.