In March 2018, in Cyan v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund, 138 S. Ct. 1061 (2018), the Supreme Court held that the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 (SLUSA) did not strip state courts of concurrent jurisdiction over class actions alleging violations of the Securities Act of 1933 (1933 Act) where such lawsuits do not also assert claims under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (over which federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction). In the wake of the Cyan decision, the number of 1933 Act claims brought in state court has increased dramatically, with the most significant increase occurring in New York. In the first year after the Cyan decision, 20 cases pursuing 1933 Act claims were brought in New York state court.
Cornerstone Research
New York has quickly become one of the most active venues for actions of this type. As these cases proceed, New York courts have been faced, and will continue to be faced with, a number of important issues.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
