By Amanda Bronstad | November 4, 2019
Lieff Cabraser's Anne Shaver, representing the plaintiffs, got a lot of questions from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit about Microsoft's employment practices. Citing Walmart v. Dukes, Judge Johnnie Rawlinson told her, "I don't feel there is a policy that's been pointed out."
By Mike Scarcella | October 29, 2019
Oracle is represented in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit by Craig Holman, who leads the government contracts and national security practices at Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer.
By Mark Harris | October 25, 2019
Not too long from now, all of the active contracts in a company's corpus will be digitized and translated into structured data. Instead of being disguised in impenetrable legalese, locked into scanned PDFs and then, often, misplaced entirely, contracts will become a source of incredibly valuable data for the enterprises that enter into them.
By Mike Scarcella | October 24, 2019
The advocates for the employee argue in their court filings at the Supreme Court that the EEOC didn't confess any misgivings about its win in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit—only the Trump-era Justice Department did.
By Marcia Coyle | October 8, 2019
The justices peppered the lawyers with hypotheticals as they probed the text of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
By Cheryl Miller | September 20, 2019
The case has been closely watched by the marijuana industry and employment lawyers advising businesses in the cannabis space.
By Ross Todd | August 27, 2019
A nonprofit video producer founded by political commentator Dennis Prager argued that a Ninth Circuit panel should revive its claims that YouTube violated its First Amendment rights by restricting access to some of its videos.
By Marcia Coyle | August 9, 2019
"The United States now agrees with petitioner that summary judgment in favor of the EEOC was inappropriate," U.S. Solicitor General Noel Francisco told the justices in BNSF v. EEOC.
By R. Robin McDonald | July 26, 2019
The panel found the award should only have used hourly rates and time spent litigating the case, and should not have included a financial enhancement.
By Raychel Lean | July 18, 2019
The $43,000 judgment against a New York mortgage lender had been vacated on grounds of excusable neglect, but the Fourth District Court of Appeal ruled that was a mistake.
Presented by BigVoodoo
General Counsel Summit is the premier event for in-house counsel, hosting esteemed legal minds from all sectors of the economy.
Join General Counsel and Senior Legal Leaders at the Premier Forum Designed For and by General Counsel from Fortune 1000 Companies
WIPL is the original global forum facilitating women-to-women exchange on leadership and legal issues.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS