By Marcia Coyle | July 8, 2020
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, joined by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, said in dissent: "Today, for the first time, the court casts totally aside countervailing rights and interests in its zeal to secure religious rights to the nth degree."
By Mike Scarcella | July 6, 2020
"The district judge did not consider or try the lesser alternative of permitting the parties and their counsel to select their own corporate representatives," the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit said.
By Mike Scarcella | May 27, 2020
"Any liability stems entirely from their paying women less, and not from why they chose to do so," California lawyer Daniel Siegel told the justices in a closely watched Equal Pay Act case from the Ninth Circuit.
By Ross Todd | May 26, 2020
The oil companies, which were seeking to keep one set of cases in federal court and uphold a motion to dismiss win in the other, were on the wrong side of two published opinions written by Ninth Circuit Judge Sandra Ikuta.
By Cheryl Miller | April 27, 2020
Lawyers at Wachtell, tracking the litigation, said the California trial judge's ruling "suggests that courts will not be eager to interfere with legislative efforts to promote diversity among directors of public companies."
By Mike Scarcella | March 27, 2020
"There should be one, uniform answer to the important question whether the Equal Pay Act permits employers to base wages on prior pay," lawyers from Jones Day, representing the Fresno County superintendent of schools, asserted in a new petition at the U.S. Supreme Court.
By Tom McParland | March 6, 2020
Discriminatory remarks not specifically directed at an employee can help form the basis for a claim of bias based on religion and national origin.
By Mike Scarcella | February 27, 2020
"The express purpose of the [Equal Pay Act] was to eradicate the practice of paying women less simply because they are women," Judge Morgan Christen of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit wrote for the majority.
By Mike Scarcella | February 4, 2020
Consovoy McCarthy attorneys are now at the U.S. Supreme Court in a consumer protection case that confronts Washington state claims that 5-Hour Energy advertisements were deceptive.
By Amanda Bronstad | December 30, 2019
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that the word "diet" in Diet Dr Pepper did not dupe consumers into believing they could lose weight by drinking the beverage.
Presented by BigVoodoo
General Counsel Summit is the premier event for in-house counsel, hosting esteemed legal minds from all sectors of the economy.
Join General Counsel and Senior Legal Leaders at the Premier Forum Designed For and by General Counsel from Fortune 1000 Companies
WIPL is the original global forum facilitating women-to-women exchange on leadership and legal issues.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS