Attention:
Card image cap

Build a Customized South Carolina 8-Credit CLE Compliance Bundle - For 2022-2023 Compliance

Individually select approved CLE courses from our centralized online library no matter where you practice.



The Supreme Court of South Carolina Commission on CLE allows attorneys to take eight (8) of fourteen (14) CLE hours online.

CLE Center will report your earned credits to The Supreme Court of South Carolina Commission on CLE. Please update your MCLE Profile to include your SC bar number.

The Supreme Court of South Carolina Commission on CLE allows attorneys to earn up to eight (8) credits online. The maximum hours approved in South Carolina, regardless of the number of credits included in this bundle, will not exceed eight (8) hours.

You have one year from the date of purchase to complete your programs.

Please click here for answers to frequently asked questions and instructions on how to access your CLE.


$189.00
Add to Cart




Buy the bundle and earn credits for following courses!

Courses

20 Courses
Sort by
Card image cap
60 minutes
cc
The Dirtiest Word in Professionalism: Zealousness
Is it okay to be zealous, or does that push the boundaries too much? The word has been used to used to cover up all manner of sins in the practice. Join "the CLE Performer" Stuart Teicher Esq., as he explains how professionalism concepts asks us to question whether “zealousness” is proper and explains how the practice is moving away from that approach.

Stuart Teicher

1 - Ethics

Card image cap
60 minutes
cc
Becoming a Contract MVP: Establishing a Focused Approach to Contract Management
Also known as roadblock removers, strategic partners and deal accelerators. In this engaging conversation, led by two of your favorite Contract MVPs, we'll dive into the top 5 superpowers every Contract MVP has up their sleeves. And how, with the right technology partner and laser focus, you can use those superpowers to wow the business.

Legalweek

1 - General

Card image cap
63 minutes
cc
Negotiation Ethics for Lawyers: Is “Paltering” Ethical?
In the latest installment in the popular “Negotiation Ethics for Lawyers” series, Zach McGee examines the use of “paltering” in negotiations – the active use of truthful statements to create a false impression – to explore whether such behavior by lawyers is ethical. Paltering is a way of deceiving the other side that differs both from lying by commission – where you misstate facts – and lying by omission – where you fail to provide information. In this program, you’ll not only learn to spot when the other side in a negotiation is paltering but also to understand why paltering works so well and why people have such different views on whether it is ethical. Using a hypothetical negotiation between lawyers, Zach will review the ethics rules that apply to lawyers in negotiations and discuss whether paltering in this context is permitted by the rules. You’ll also learn some negotiation techniques that you can use when your opponent is paltering to protect yourself and your client from being deceived. Rules covered include: ABA Model Rules 4.1 & 8.4; Cal. Business & Professions Code Sec. 6068.

New Media Legal

1.05 - Ethics

Card image cap
61 minutes
cc
Competency Double Play: Depression and Substance Abuse
Experts differ on whether lawyers are more prone to depression than others who work in equally high-stress occupations such as doctors. But one thing is clear: the stigma associated with depression is one of the reasons lawyers may not get help when they need it. Is an ancient virus the reason humans are susceptible to substance use disorders? How has modern medicine changed the way we treat substance use disorders? This program answers these important questions so that today's lawyers have the tools they need to help themselves or a colleague.

New Media Legal

1.02 - Mental Health and Substance Abuse

  • First
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3