X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Of the 30 or so professional venture capital (VC) funds currently present on the Hungarian market most are Western European and North American institutional investors, meaning domestic sources are marginal. While VC investors in Hungary have mainly brought expansion capital to large businesses in Hungary due to the successful buy-out opportunities they promised, there is a far greater demand for financing for start-up and early stage capital.

While western VC investors are more interested in the highest profit, state-owned VC funds are more focused on industry growth. A typical VC would rather invest in enterprises promising higher returns faster than in start-ups or early-stage small and medium enterprises (SMEs), where it can take anything up to 10 years to see any returns. SMEs also present a higher risk to large investors; their size alone indicates a management more dependent on its individuals, less diversification, and fewer exits for investors (secondary sales to larger VC and private equity (PE) firms may become the only applicable exit route).

New legislation was introduced at the beginning of 2006, which analysts predicted would smooth the way for an increase in the number of local VC and PE market participants. They were mistaken. However, although private capital did not move, state financial institutions announced their mission to help small and medium enterprises (SMEs) become competitive in Europe, simultaneously establishing venture capital funds to this end.

The ratio of early-stage investments to the total value of investments in Hungary in 2006 was only 0.31%, in comparison to 2.7% in Central Europe and 10% in Europe. This trend showed no signs of abating throughout most of 2007. The ratio of early stage investments to the total value was 0.3%.

However, the overall value of invested capital increased nearly five-fold on the Hungarian market in 2006 in comparison to the previous year. The ratio of VC- and PE-invested enterprises reached 0.6% of the Hungarian GDP in 2006, which saw Hungary ranked fifth in Europe. The volume, value and frequency of investment transactions were all on the up. The same year saw the investment of state-owned funds in enterprises in the early or expansive stage (medium enterprises) reaching E23.5bn (£18.6bn). In the first 10 months of 2007, this figure reached E27bn (£21.3bn).

A solution to this slow growth comes from the European Commission’s Directorate General for Regional Policy and the EIB Group (European Investment Fund and European Investment Bank). The Joint European Resources for Micro to Medium Enterprises initiative, known as JEREMIE, assures E40bn-E50bn (£32bn-£40bn) between 2007 and 2013 for the Hungarian VC and PE market. The fund will be divided to further funds, each of which will need 30% of private financing.

This will also solve a further problem of state funding. In contrast with professional investors, the state cannot decide which transaction will best recover its costs. It is expected that, with this extra 70% state funding, many business angels on the market currently sitting in the wings would have sufficient capital to flourish a medium-sized enterprise with their means, cash and industrial knowledge where they would otherwise be unwilling to enter the market. Without the JEREMIE programme, these private investors would certainly not be able to undertake the long-term capital demand of medium-sized enterprises.

The effect of the JEREMIE fund on the Hungarian market could be extremely favourable to investors, particularly taking into account the fact that Hungary was the first country in Eastern Europe to initiate privatisation and establish VC and PE funds. Executives, therefore, have a great deal of longstanding experience in the industry and are familiar with the country’s prosperous legal framework, which is fully harmonised with the European legislation.

The concept of venture capital was once non-existent for companies in Hungary. The first legislation on VC and PE funds in 1998 was chaotic and even hindered the creation of funds. However, an amendment to the Capital Markets Act (Act CXX of 2001) in 2006 replaced this unsuitable legislation. Most significantly, the amendment also opened the VC and PE market doors to national institutional investors.

According to Chapter XXXI/A of the amended Capital Market Act, venture capital fund management companies:

This premium content is reserved for
Legal Week Subscribers.
Subscribe today and get 10% off.

A PREMIUM SUBSCRIPTION PROVIDES:

  • Trusted insight, news and analysis from the UK and across the globe
  • Connections to senior business lawyers within the leading law firms and legal departments
  • Unique access to ALM's unrivalled, market-leading reporting in the US and Asia and cutting-edge research, including Legal Week's UK Top 50 and Global 100 rankings
  • The Legal Week Daily News Alert, Editor's Highlights, and Breaking News digital newsletters and more, plus a choice of over 70 ALM newsletters
  • Optimized access on all of your devices: desktop, tablet and mobile
  • Complete access to the site's full archive of more than 56,000 articles

Already have an account?

For enterprise-wide or corporate enquiries, please contact Paul Reeves on Preeves@alm.com or call on +44 (0) 203 875 0651

 

Legal Week Newsletters & Alerts

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your subscription, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters and alerts. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2018 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.