Clare Murray argues that law firms should think twice before interpreting the Freshfields Bloxham case as a green light to defend discrimination claims to the hilt.
October 12, 2007 at 04:55 AM
1 minute read
By a:1:{i:0;s:1:" ";} |
Updated on October 12, 2007
X
Thank you for sharing!
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
The original version of this story was published on Legalweek
“I believe that, in practice, Freshfields’ success actually leaves law firms and the legal sector in a potentially more vulnerable position for the future.”
With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas. View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team. View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same. View Now
Law.com Compass includes access to our exclusive industry reports, combining the unmatched expertise of our analyst team with ALM’s deep bench of proprietary information to provide insights that can’t be found anywhere else.
Law.com Compass delivers you the full scope of information, from the rankings of the Am Law 200 and NLJ 500 to intricate details and comparisons of firms’ financials, staffing, clients, news and events.