Legal Developments: Doctor, doctor
The recent House of Lords decision in the case of Gregg v Scott has established new parameters for professionals facing claims for loss of chance. But not all professionals are likely to be treated equally, find Andrew Horrocks and Allan Neil
Imagine your GP’s negligence caused your chances of recovering from cancer to fall from 60% to 40%. Then imagine your GP’s negligence caused your chances to fall from 40% to nil. In the recent decision of Gregg v Scott , the House of Lords confirmed by a majority (Lord Nicholls and Lord Hope dissenting) that you cannot recover damages in the second of these scenarios. In Lord Nicholls’ dissenting view, the decision leaves the law on loss of a chance in a state that is “crude to an extent bordering on arbitrariness”.
This premium content is reserved for
Legal Week Subscribers.
A PREMIUM SUBSCRIPTION PROVIDES:
- Trusted insight, news and analysis from the UK and across the globe
- Connections to senior business lawyers within the leading law firms and legal departments
- Unique access to ALM's unrivalled, market-leading reporting in the US and Asia and cutting-edge research, including Legal Week's UK Top 50 and Global 100 rankings
- The Legal Week Daily News Alert, Editor's Highlights, and Breaking News digital newsletters and more, plus a choice of over 70 ALM newsletters
- Optimized access on all of your devices: desktop, tablet and mobile
- Complete access to the site's full archive of more than 56,000 articles
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate enquiries, please contact Paul Reeves on Preeves@alm.com or call on +44 (0) 203 875 0651