Clyde & Co and DAC Beachcroft are in the running to take over Sedgwick’s London office, after the U.S. firm announced that it will close for business early next year.
The London office, which houses 13 lawyers, including six partners, operates as a separate limited liability partnership to the U.S. arm of the firm. It is led by insurance partner Edward Smerdon, who is also an at-large member of Sedgwick’s executive committee.
Multiple sources with knowledge of the matter said that interest in taking on the London team had been registered by both Clydes and DAC Beachcroft and that Clydes had held talks at least three weeks ago.
Clydes is also understood to be in talks to take on teams of Sedgwick lawyers in the U.S., where the San Francisco-based firm has offices in Chicago, Dallas, Kansas, Los Angeles, Miami, New Jersey, New York, Seattle and Orange County.
In a statement, Clydes said: “As with all major businesses, we continuously study our markets for opportunities and, at any given time, we may be in discussion with a number of individuals, teams or firms. As a matter of policy, we never comment on such discussions until it is appropriate to do so.” DAC Beachcroft declined to comment.
News of Clydes and DACB’s interest in Sedgwick’s London team comes after the firm’s announcement that it would wind down its business ahead of a closure in early January. The decision follows a stream of partner departures and office closures in Washington, D.C., Austin, Texas, Fort Lauderdale and Houston.
The firm’s head count has been slashed by 39% over 12 months, leaving it with fewer than 160 lawyers, according to data compiled by ALM Legal Intelligence. Six partners from the firm’s New York and Chicago offices have recently joined Kennedys, including New York and Chicago managing partners John Blancett and Eric Scheiner.
Sedgwick’s dissolution could be the start of a long and costly ordeal for its former partners and, potentially, the law firms where they resume their careers, according to Legal Week sister title The American Lawyer.
Any mass hire of Sedgwick lawyers could be carried out in a similar manner to Blank Rome’s February 2016 addition of 100 lawyers from Dickstein Shapiro, according to industry sources.
In that deal, Blank Rome avoided assuming the failing firm’s debts while absorbing the accounts receivable of some of Dickstein Shapiro’s top billers. That deal has so far avoided being publicly contested by former Dickstein Shapiro partners who may still use the courts to regain lost capital, according to one legal industry source familiar with the deal.
While any mass hire of Sedgwick lawyers is likely to be smaller than the size of Blank Rome’s mass acquisition, one potential complication for the firm is the number of rainmakers who have already left the firm in the past year who are owed capital. Adding to that complication is a capital contribution policy at the firm that required more money from the highest-paid partners, as described to The American Lawyer by a source familiar with Sedgwick’s finances.
Sedgwick required that equity partners contribute capital equal to 50 percent to 55 percent of their highest annual compensation. New partners were given two years to pay their total capital requirement, and partners who earned a boost in compensation in any year were required to up their capital account in the same year, the source said. For departing partners, the firm paid out capital contributions over 36 months.
It is unclear whether Sedgwick has been making those payments. But either way, the firm’s obligation has been rapidly growing. The firm has seen around 50 partners leave the firm during the past 12 months, although it is unlikely that all were equity partners.
One purported benefit for a law firm to require a large capital account is that it can encourage partners to stay at the firm and to fight to save it during a downturn. But there is also a significant downside.
“A lot of people are going to lose a lot of money,” said one legal industry source.
If Sedgwick is unable to avoid a formal bankruptcy filing, departed partners who have received capital payments or salary in the past 18 months could be the target of a bankruptcy trustee.
In the case of now-defunct Dewey & LeBoeuf, a group of dozens of partners eventually agreed to pay a total of $71 million in capital and salary to settle claims with a bankruptcy trustee. Some partners opted out of that settlement, and at least three former partners eventually filed for bankruptcy as a result of debts incurred by the firm’s demise.
One former equity partner at Sedgwick who left the firm earlier this year described his time at Sedgwick as “expensive.”
“I’m just trying to put that whole experience out of my mind,” the former partner said.
DAC Beachcroft declined to comment.