Lateral Search Firm Drops Suit Against Freshfields
The dismissal was another instance of a headhunter dropping a suit against a firm on the heels of an adverse court ruling.
A recruiter agency has agreed to dismiss the remainder of a lawsuit filed against Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer in the U.S., in another instance of a headhunter dropping a suit against a firm on the heels of an adverse court ruling.
Boston Executive Search Associates Inc. in the last week signed a stipulation for dismissal with prejudice in its lawsuit against Freshfields. The suit argued the law firm “hijacked” the recruitment of a leading M&A partner from Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton and wrongly cut it out of a placement fee.
U.S. District Judge Richard Stearns of the District of Massachusetts dismissed most of Boston Executive’s claims against Freshfields in an eight-page decision in June, noting the parties didn’t have a written agreement and that Massachusetts state law prohibits contractual claims for broker fees that aren’t in writing. The remaining claim was based on a state law that broadly prohibits unfair or deceptive business practices.
This premium content is reserved for
Law.com International Subscribers.
BENEFITS OF A SUBSCRIPTION INCLUDE:
- Customized news by region including UK, Asia, Europe, Latin America, Middle East, Africa, and North America
- Cutting-edge research such as UK Top 100, China 45, and Asia 50
- Get the inside track on the biggest breaking stories that delve deep into the issues behind the headlines
- Comprehensive coverage of the dynamic legal market from people moves to the major international jurisdictions
- Global view into how legal tech, business of law, in-house and regulatory environments are intersecting worldwide
Already a subscriber? Sign In Now