Clydes to allow fee earners to count pro bono as billable hours
Clyde & Co has introduced a new policy that will see UK fee earners allowed to include up to 50 hours of pro bono work in their billable hours targets. The new policy, which came into effect last month, means lawyers will be able to count some pro bono work as chargeable hours for the purpose of performance-related bonus targets.
June 01, 2011 at 07:03 PM
2 minute read
Clyde & Co has introduced a new policy that will see UK fee earners allowed to include up to 50 hours of pro bono work in their billable hours targets.
The new policy, which came into effect last month, means lawyers will be able to count some pro bono work as chargeable hours for the purpose of performance-related bonus targets.
Billable targets vary between groups, with the lower-end target thought to be in the region of 1,400. Bonuses will be paid out in August.
The move comes after Clydes introduced the same policy in its US offices towards the end of 2010.
Senior partner Michael Payton said: "I have always been struck by how good pro-bono efforts in the US are. They always seem to be ahead of us in that respect, so when our US offices told us they were going to include pro bono hours in their billable targets, we thought it was absolutely right that we should do the same.
"For associates, there are so many competing calls on their time that hopefully this will alleviate some of the pressure."
Payton is currently spearheading two new initiatives through the firm's pro bono and community programme, Clyde & Community. The first sees the firm joining with insurers to give pro bono advice to consumers having difficulties with claims or products, and the other is intended to promote peer mediation in schools.
Last month Clydes announced that its revenues for the last financial year rose by just over 10%, taking turnover through the £200m barrier for the first time.
The 10.4% increase put 2010-11 turnover at £212m, up from £192m the previous year, with UK operations contributing 59% of the firm's total revenues.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMiddle East Moves: Clyde & Co, Pinsent Masons, Greenberg Traurig, and More Key Hires
3 minute readHSF Investigating “Deeply Offensive” Partner Tweet Directed at Jewish Lawyer
2 minute readHong Kong Boutique Practice Lures K&L Gates Capital Markets Partner
Former US Law Firm Associate Sentenced to 5 and a Half Years in Prison
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Florida Court Rules in Favor of Production Co. in Dispute Over Viral Documentary 'Died Suddenly'
- 2What We Learned From In-House Lawyers in 2024
- 3Cannabis 'Cannibalization' Among Concerns of NYS Pot Attorneys
- 4Legal Drafting Startup DocDraft AI Launches Drafting, Attorney Service Platform
- 5Court System Names New Administrative Judges for New York City Courts in Leadership Shakeup
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250