Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

The recent judgment of the Court of Appeal in the case of Ray and Karen Parlour ( Parlour v Parlour [2004]) received considerable media attention, with Karen Parlour being awarded annual maintenance for herself and her three children of £444,000 on her former husband’s current income. A case that received far less attention, although it was heard at the same time, was that of Kenneth and Julia McFarlane ( McFarlane v McFarlane [2004]). However, a great deal of what appeared in the national press on Parlour was misleading and, in the cold light of day, the judgment is not quite as sensational as the press portrayed.

This premium content is reserved for
Law.com International Subscribers.


  • Customized news by region including UK, Asia, Europe, Latin America, Middle East, Africa, and North America
  • Cutting-edge research such as UK Top 100, China 45, and Asia 50
  • Get the inside track on the biggest breaking stories that delve deep into the issues behind the headlines
  • Comprehensive coverage of the dynamic legal market from people moves to the major international jurisdictions
  • Global view into how legal tech, business of law, in-house and regulatory environments are intersecting worldwide

Already a subscriber?


Law.com International Newsletters & Briefings

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

Sign up for an unlimited number of complementary newsletters, alerts, and International Briefings. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 American Lawyer Media International, LLC. All Rights Reserved.