As the Facebook generation enters the workforce and competition for jobs increases, employers may be tempted to look into candidates’ backgrounds. This is a risky strategy, says Timothy Pitt-Payne
Recruitment decisions are difficult. They are often taken under acute pressure of time. There are a number of legal risks, including the possibility of a discrimination claim from an unsuccessful candidate. If an unsuitable appointment is made, then the consequences can be very expensive, and on occasion disastrous. Employment vetting is about one specific aspect of the recruitment process: namely, identifying potential employees who present an unacceptable risk of serious harm to the organisation, or to its customers or service users. Vetting raises significant problems, not simply for employers, but for society as a whole. For instance, a balance needs to be struck between preventing individuals from having their careers blighted by unproven allegations, and protecting vulnerable groups (such as children, the elderly and disabled people) from the risk of financial, physical or sexual abuse.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
