9th Cir.; 13-56069 The court of appeals affirmed a judgment. The court held that a California state statute prohibiting alcohol manufacturers and wholesalers…
June 14, 2017 at 06:58 PM
1 minute read
9th Cir.;
13-56069
The court of appeals affirmed a judgment. The court held that a California state statute prohibiting alcohol manufacturers and wholesalers from providing anything of value to retailers in exchange for advertising does not violate the First Amendment.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
We are seeking an associate to join our Employee Benefits practice. Candidates should have three to six years of employee benefits experienc...
Health Law Associate CT Shipman is seeking an associate to join our national longstanding health law practice. Candidates must have t...
Shipman & Goodwin LLP is seeking two associates to expand our national commercial real estate lending practice. Candidates should have ...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
