The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Max Mitchell | July 29, 2020
The justices ruled on a 5-2 vote that an Uber driver was not engaging in an independently established business when driving for the ride share company. Some attorneys say the decision could have a ripple effect for the broader gig economy.
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Max Mitchell | May 14, 2020
Prominent attorneys Thomas Kline of Kline & Specter, Robert Mongeluzzi of Saltz, Mongeluzzi & Bendesky and Richard Sprague of Sprague & Sprague filed two private criminal complaints against the Amtrak engineer.
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Max Mitchell | April 14, 2020
The suit argues that the company's policy of offering credits for canceled flights violates its contract with customers and federal law.
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Max Mitchell | March 13, 2020
Uber argued that, upon registering, the rider would have reached a screen that told her she was agreeing to the terms and conditions by creating an Uber account, and that the screen would have included a hyperlink to the company's arbitration policy.
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Cliff Rieders | October 3, 2019
Cliff Rieders In my first article on Pellegrino v. Transportation Safety Administration, No. 15-3047 (3d Cir. July 11, 2018) (Krause, J.), I predicted that, when revisited, the panel decision supporting the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the United States would be overturned. This time, I was correct!
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Max Mitchell | September 12, 2019
The half-hour argument session focused in large part on how the woman identified herself in the post and Facebook profile, and how those factors could play into the decades-old test used to determine if a public employee's speech is protected.
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Max Mitchell | September 11, 2019
The case presents the justices with their first opportunity to evaluate whether the legal view of unemployment eligibility should evolve as "gig" jobs proliferate.
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Charles Toutant | September 11, 2019
The panel ruled that Uber drivers fall under an exemption to the Federal Arbitration Act for transportation workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce.
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By David Gialanella | August 23, 2019
"Circumstantial evidence of [the] lawyers' typical mailing procedures is irrelevant because, 'due to a clerical oversight,' those procedures were admittedly not followed," Circuit Judge David Porter wrote.
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Max Mitchell | August 22, 2019
The case, Brown v. Greyhound Lines, was one of a cluster of cases being handled in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas that stemmed from a 2013 collision on Interstate 80 in Union County in central Pennsylvania.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
McCarter & English, LLP, a well established and growing law firm, is actively seeking a talented and driven associate having 2-5 years o...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS