By Colby Hamilton | October 24, 2018
U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer said all of the plaintiffs expert witnesses failed to pass the Daubert test, dealing a potentially fatal blow to the massive products liability suit.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Timothy M. Tippins | September 5, 2018
In his column on Matrimonial Practice, Timothy M. Tippins explores some of the evidentiary issues presented when computer-based test interpretations are used by expert witnesses.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Michael J. Hutter | August 1, 2018
In his Evidence column, Michael J. Hutter discusses whether out-of-court material may be the sole or principal basis for an expert's opinion.
New York Law Journal | Expert Opinion
By Sharon M. Porcellio | July 26, 2018
U.S. Senior District Judge Michael A. Telesca then had more than 10 briefs and supplemental letter briefs and multiple statements and counter-statements of fact and other submissions from the two parties to decide the pending summary judgment motions.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Timothy M. Tippins | July 18, 2018
In his column on Matrimonial Practice, Timothy M. Tippins explores the current controversy regarding the reliability of psychological testing in custody determinations.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By John L.A. Lyddane | July 16, 2018
Since the amendment of Section 3101(d) in 1985, New York state has required that litigants in medical malpractice cases disclose the substance of the testimony they expect to produce through their expert witnesses at trial.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Jeff S. Korek and Abraham Z. Melamed | June 4, 2018
When the primary reason plaintiff seeks to introduce rebuttal testimony is to simply bolster their own case and counter the defendant's, courts generally do not permit the rebuttal testimony.
By R. Robin McDonald | April 23, 2018
The jury also convicted McIver of aggravated assault, possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony and influencing a witness.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Michael J. Hutter | April 4, 2018
Evidence columnist Michael J. Hutter writes: In today's increasingly complex legal environment, attorneys may need the assistance of professionals, e.g., scientists, engineers, physicians, accountants, investment bankers and even, public relations specialists to effectively and competently advise their clients. Working with these professionals will often require the disclosure to them of attorney-client privileged information. Does such disclosure result in the loss of privilege protection?
By Cogan Schneier | March 22, 2018
Justice Department lawyers say they're seeking to prove that AT&T's proposed merger with Time Warner will stifle competition.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Epstein Becker & Green is seeking an associate to joins its Commercial Litigation practice in our Columbus or Cincinnati offices. Ca...
Job Opportunity: Location: Prestigious Florida Law Firm seeks to hire a Business attorney with at least 5 years of experience for their Ft. ...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS