A defendant seller (seller) decided not to “consummate a sale” to the plaintiff. The alleged contract of sale (alleged contract) provided for a purchase price of $9,500,000. The seller instead sold the property to the proposed intervenor in the subject litigation (intervenor), for $9,700,000.

The plaintiff alleged that it had a “legally binding and enforceable” contract with the seller, the seller “reneged” and had “improperly entered into” a contract with the intervenor and the seller still held the plaintiff’s $475,000 down payment. The seller denied that the alleged contract was “legally binding and enforceable” and was willing to return the down payment.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]