The court was presented with an evidentiary issue during trial of a contested Mental Hygiene Law Art. 81 proceeding for appointment of a guardian for the personal and property management needs of Steven S., an allegedly incapacitated person, due to the purported financial improprieties, exploitation, and undue influence perpetrated by cross-petitioner.
The court held that CPLR §4519—New York’s so-called “Dead Man’s Statute”—does not apply to possible testimony by cross-petitioner and his witnesses, as Steven S. is not suffering from a “mental illness” under §4519 and, even if Steven S. did suffer from a mental illness, the protections afforded by §4519 were waived by his counsel, who questioned a nonparty in detail about the business transactions between the cross-petitioner and the witness.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
