A “prior nonconforming use” is a use of property that existed before the enactment of a local zoning restriction that prohibits the use. New York law has long made it clear that a prior nonconforming use in existence when a zoning ordinance is adopted generally is constitutionally protected even though the ordinance may explicitly ban the activity that is the subject of the prior nonconforming use. See, e.g., People v. Miller, 304 N.Y. 105 (1952).

Courts and legislators disfavor the broad application of the prior nonconforming use doctrine, as the law generally views nonconforming uses as detrimental to a zoning scheme, and the overriding public policy of zoning in New York is aimed at their reasonable restriction and eventual elimination. See, e.g., Matter of Toys “R” Us v. Silva, 89 N.Y.2d 411 (1996). Nevertheless, property owners engaging in a particular activity may have a vested right to use their land for that activity, and prior nonconforming uses generally are permitted to continue. See, e.g., Matter of Rudolf Steiner Fellowship Found. v. De Luccia, 90 N.Y.2d 453 (1997).

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]