New Jersey Law Journal | Commentary
By Jonathan Bick | June 20, 2023
Most agree that internet deepfake content is widespread and may be used to manipulate the public, attack personal rights, infringe intellectual property and cause personal data difficulties. However, little agreement exists as to who is legally liable for internet AI deepfake content.
New Jersey Law Journal | Commentary
By Jonathan Bick | June 1, 2023
AI is normally embodied in a program. Since computer programmers write, modify, and test code and scripts that allow computer software and applications to function properly, programmers have been found liable for harm caused by programs.
By Maria Dinzeo | May 31, 2023
The Paris-based organization, which started as a Facebook group, now boasts 13,000 members in 150 countries.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Joel G. MacMull | May 18, 2023
By developing a consciousness for these potential pitfalls, the hope is that lawyers (and other service providers) can use AICGs to significantly aid, but not substitute for, their ethical (and perhaps moral) responsibilities to their clients. This article seeks to raise awareness among practicing lawyers where it otherwise may be lacking.
By Adolfo Pesquera | May 10, 2023
"Microsoft remained willfully blind to its own infringement by failing to review the relevant specifications, and its own internal documents in light of, and considering, the claims of the patents-in-suit from Proxense's letter," Proxense LLC complaint claims.
By Isha Marathe | May 2, 2023
A trio of AI art generators—Stability AI, Deviant Art and Midjourney—are looking to dismiss a class action complaint against them alleging copyright infringement. IP attorneys weigh in on the central arguments of the case and the impact it might have on this evolving issue.
By Isha Marathe | April 27, 2023
While there is no straightforward way to protect an AI-generated output, a Mayer Brown panel examined various avenues that do exist to safeguard intellectual property of an AI work.
By Isha Marathe | April 10, 2023
The U.S. Copyright Office issued a copyright registration to a comic book creator that used a generative AI tool to create visuals, and then revoked it. The agency's action, and subsequent guidance, may have far-reaching consequences for ongoing and future cases around AI IP rights.
By Allison Dunn | March 24, 2023
"Photographers are in this impossible position of being snobs about their work and not posting, to being labeled opportunists and copyright trolls because they take offense when people copy their image without getting paid," said David C. Deal, founder and principal attorney at The Law Office of David C. Deal in Charlottesville, Virginia. "At no point are we ever going to apologize for getting compensated for the work."
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Jillian M. Taylor | March 22, 2023
This article investigates the rise of artificial intelligence in the creation of creative works. It also looks to analyze whether and how such works may be protected under copyright laws.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Epstein Becker & Green is seeking an associate to joins its Commercial Litigation practice in our Columbus or Cincinnati offices. Ca...
Job Opportunity: Location: Prestigious Florida Law Firm seeks to hire a Business attorney with at least 5 years of experience for their Ft. ...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS