ALBANY - A plaintiff seeking recovery on an unjust enrichment claim must establish not only a nexus with the defendant, but that the plaintiff and defendant had dealings together, a divided Court of Appeals held yesterday.
While the majority in Georgia Malone & Co. v. Rieder, 132, suggested the court is only following precedent, two dissenting judges said the ruling represents a substantial expansion of prior holdings.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
