Editor’s note: This column was written in response to “Good-Faith Considerations for Bad-Faith Insurance (Holt) Litigation in Georgia,” a Sept. 7 guest column written by four Alston & Bird attorneys. To read that column, visit https://bit.ly/48dl9hA.

Like perennial flowers, opinion pieces feigning insurance-industry despair continue to sprout. The latest found in this paper was sown on Sept. 7. But there are other opinions, and even real facts to consider when it comes to the insurance industry’s long-standing practices of lowball monetary offers coupled with one-sided terms in their onerous release agreements.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]