The Georgia Court of Appeals was asked to weigh in on how to define the word “invalid” in insurance policies at oral argument Wednesday, as it heard a dispute between an Augusta car dealership and its insurer.

Presiding Judge Christopher McFadden extensively questioned both parties, hinting that he found the existing case law flawed, citing poor reasoning in the court’s prior opinion in Holmes v. Clear Channel Outdoor and asking the parties what else they could point to to inform the court’s decision.