Privacy, technology and U.S. government control all came together in an Eastern District case in which federal prosecutors wanted Apple to unlock the iPhone of an alleged drug dealer.
December 23, 2016 at 04:06 AM
1 minute read
Privacy, technology and U.S. government control all came together in an Eastern District case in which federal prosecutors wanted Apple to unlock the iPhone of an alleged drug dealer.
Eastern District Magistrate Judge James Orenstein ruled Feb. 29 that a centuries-old law invoked by the government provided no basis to compel the computer maker’s assistance.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
