Federal prosecutors handling the government’s criminal case against Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes have fired back at claims that they failed to allege any single fraudulent statement or misrepresentation made about the now-defunct blood-testing company.

In court papers filed Monday, prosecutors argued that they charged the wire fraud case against Holmes and her codefendant, former company president Ramesh Balwani, in a way that does not require them to prove any particular statement was false.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]