The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Craig R. Tractenberg and Sarah Biser | April 21, 2022
Recently, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that, unlike petitions to compel arbitration, petitions for confirm or vacate an arbitration award cannot be brought in federal court simply because the underlying dispute involves a federal question.
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Stephen A. Miller and Leigh Ann Benson | April 14, 2022
In Ruan v. United States, the U.S. Supreme Court will decide whether a jury should consider a doctor's subjective intent when assessing a potential violation of the Controlled Substances Act.
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Marcia Coyle | April 14, 2022
Three former NFL players headline the brief filed in this terms key religious freedom case.
By Adolfo Pesquera | April 4, 2022
Plaintiffs had argued, "If this court holds that attorneys cannot be compelled to join and financially support a bar association, its decision would hardly be the death knell for such organizations."
By Alaina Lancaster | Zack Needles | April 1, 2022
In this week's episode, longtime Supreme Court reporter Marcia Coyle shared what she learned from Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson during the proceedings.
By Diego Radzinschi | March 23, 2022
Here's a look at photos from the first two days of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson's historic nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court.
By Avalon Zoppo | March 15, 2022
"If Biden had nominated a white male with a similar background as Judge Jackson ... no one would be asking here whether their whiteness and their maleness might be a dispositive factor towards whether they were qualified for the job," Judge Joseph Greenaway said.
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Carl W. Hittinger and Jeanne-Michele Mariani | March 8, 2022
Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, if confirmed, will certainly be personally challenged to follow Justice Stephen Breyer's antitrust legacy. Regardless of Jackson's unclear antitrust views, she should be questioned at her Senate confirmation hearing about them.
By Marcia Coyle | March 7, 2022
The Pennsylvania case is Toth v. Chapman, while the North Carolina dispute is styled Moore v. Harper.
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Stephen A. Miller and Nathan J. Larkin | March 2, 2022
The U.S. Supreme Court is considering a case that tests the boundaries of the Second Amendment.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS