The Legal Intelligencer | Analysis
By Mike Scarcella | March 10, 2020
In 'Trump v. Pennsylvania,' the U.S. Supreme Court has a new chance to express its views on the lawfulness of nationwide injunctions.
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Stephen A. Miller and Kristin A. Keehan | March 4, 2020
The Constitution permits judges to adjudicate only actual, ongoing cases or controversies. A case can become "moot," even on appeal, when the issues…
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Mike Scarcella | February 26, 2020
"The decision below could not possibly threaten the availability of retirement plans, as petitioners and their amici suggest," attorney Jerome Schlichter told the Supreme Court.
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Stephen A. Miller and Julie Dostal | February 5, 2020
The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument November 2019 in Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California, a case that asks whether the Trump administration lawfully terminated the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy, also known as DACA.
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Stephanie K. Rawitt | January 23, 2020
The coming year will show many changes in federal and state employment law, and employers should look to be prepared for those changes in 2020 and beyond.
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Max Mitchell | January 8, 2020
With the extended Dec. 30 deadline now passed, the Third Circuit's precedent stands, and the lawsuit, which is over a security search gone awry at the Philadelphia International Airport, is set to proceed.
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Stephen A. Miller and Chase A. Howard | January 8, 2020
In December, the court heard oral argument in Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, a case that may provide clarity on what sort of material constitutes a "government edict" that falls outside the scope of the copyright laws.
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Matthew T. Mangino | December 12, 2019
Last month, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that it is a violation of the Fifth Amendment's protection against self-incrimination to compel a defendant to disclose a password to allow police access to a "lawfully seized, but encrypted, computer."
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Max Mitchell | December 10, 2019
Writing for the majority, Justice Clarence Thomas said that, despite Congress having included language allowing for broad discovery rules in other statutes, the language of the FDCPA clearly said the statute of limitations began to run at the time the violation occurred.
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Tom McParland | December 9, 2019
The Third Circuit ruled earlier this year that judges do not meet the narrow exception to the First Amendment's prohibition against considering party allegiance in government hiring.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.
Consulting Magazine identifies consultants that have the biggest impact on their clients, firms and the profession.
Company Description CourtLaw Injury Lawyers is an established Personal Injury Law Firm with its primary office located in Perth Amboy, New J...
Black Owl Recruiting is looking for a number of qualified applicants to fill positions for a highly reputable client. Recent experience work...
McManimon, Scotland & Baumann, LLC is seeking talented and motivated Associate Attorneys with 3-7 years of experience working closely wi...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS