The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Colleen Murphy | August 12, 2022
"Recognizing the limited circumstances that justify vacating an arbitration award, we are satisfied that one such circumstance is present here: the award was procured by fraud," stated Jordan. "An honest process is what those who agree to arbitration have a right to expect."
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Aleeza Furman | August 10, 2022
Judge Christine Ward of the Allegheny Court of Common Pleas also expanded a previous delay damage award to cover a time period she had previously excluded because the holdup was due to the pandemic-induced statewide judicial emergency.
By Aleeza Furman | July 21, 2022
A Philadelphia judge awarded two former employees of a high-end retailer a combined $2.16 million, finding that verbal agreements they had made with the business' owner entitled them to payouts after they left their jobs.
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Aleeza Furman | July 20, 2022
U.S. District Judge Gerald Austin McHugh Jr. of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania found that the law firm had not advanced a theory of recovery that would allow it to claw back what it lost in the alleged scheme.
By ALM Staff | July 18, 2022
This suit was surfaced by Law.com Radar. Read the complaint here.
By ALM Staff | July 18, 2022
This suit was surfaced by Law.com Radar. Read the complaint here.
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Aleeza Furman | July 11, 2022
The main issue was complicated by the fact that the contract was never recorded in writing, leaving the outcome of the case dependent on a credibility determination by the trial judge.
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Aleeza Furman | July 1, 2022
The Superior Court acknowledged that the contents of the two agreements were interrelated but nonetheless said the arbitration clause in one could not be applied to the other.
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Colleen Murphy | June 13, 2022
"We acknowledge the trial court's sentiment that appellant 'made a bad deal' in agreeing to the term that any monies paid would be non-refundable," stated McCaffery. "Nevertheless, as the court aptly noted, contracting parties are bound by their agreements, irrespective of whether they embody reasonable or good bargains."
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Stephen S. McCloskey and Thomas V. McCarron | May 3, 2022
While courts have yet to expressly limit the scope of the waiver provision to consequential damages incurred due to termination of the contract during construction, the placement and content of the provision would seem to give an opportunity to argue for such.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
McCarter & English, LLP, a well established and growing law firm, is actively seeking a talented and driven associate having 2-5 years o...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS