The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Zack Needles | November 26, 2019
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court will not review a state Superior Court ruling that refused to send a dispute between partners of a medical practice to arbitration.
By P.J. D'Annunzio | September 26, 2019
"We hold a non-breaching party to a contract may, by its conduct following a breach, conclusively elect its remedy and be bound by it to one theory for recovery of damages," Justice Kevin Dougherty wrote for the majority.
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Max Mitchell | September 23, 2019
Thrivest filed a petition for a writ of mandamus with the Third Circuit last week, saying the district court and class action claims administrator are not following the appeals court's April ruling, which prevented the nullification of lending agreements in their entirety.
By Charles Toutant | September 18, 2019
The Third Circuit said the mere details of the lawyer's death were sufficient circumstantial evidence to show that she knew her actions would end her life.
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Zack Needles | September 12, 2019
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court is set to determine whether a restrictive covenant discussed, but not physically signed, prior to the start of work can be enforceable without an offer of additional consideration.
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By P.J. D'Annunzio | September 12, 2019
The Pennsylvania Superior Court has upheld an order of probation for a student found to have made terroristic threats, including stating a desire to "beat the record" for the number of deaths in a school shooting.
The Legal Intelligencer | Analysis
By Zack Needles | July 25, 2019
The justices granted allocatur in Pittsburgh Logistics Systems v. Beemac Trucking on July 24 to determine the validity of no-hire provisions—also known as no-poach agreements—in service contracts between companies.
By Greg Land | July 11, 2019
After a now-defunct Tennessee probation company settled a class action for $14 million last year, its parent sued Illinois Union Insurance for the money. The insurer denied coverage, but a Delaware judge ruled Tuesday that a claimed exclusion does not apply.
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Zack Needles | June 17, 2019
The consent decree between feuding health care giants Highmark and the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center remains on track to expire June 30 after a Commonwealth Court judge ruled June 14 that the agreement's modification provision does not apply to the termination date.
By Zack Needles | April 17, 2019
With a June 30 deadline fast approaching, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has granted a request by the state and health insurer Highmark to decide whether consent decrees between Highmark and health care network UPMC should be extended indefinitely until litigation between the two feuding companies is resolved.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.
Consulting Magazine identifies consultants that have the biggest impact on their clients, firms and the profession.
Associate attorney position at NJ Immigration Law firm: Leschak & Associates, LLC, based in Freehold, NJ, is looking for a full time ass...
Company Description CourtLaw Injury Lawyers is an established Personal Injury Law Firm with its primary office located in Perth Amboy, New J...
Black Owl Recruiting is looking for a number of qualified applicants to fill positions for a highly reputable client. Recent experience work...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS