The questions of attorney-client communications and attorney work product seem always to be subjects for debate. There are some principles and issues in the law that never go away, and that are never resolved no matter how many opinions or adjudications flow forth from the “Oracle at Delphi.”

In Brandywine v. Brandywine Village Associates, 2023 Pa. Super. LEXIS 336, (Pa. Super. July 28, 2023) (Stevens, P.J.E.), Carlino East Brandywine (Carlino) entered into a contract to purchase a parcel of land adjoining a shopping center owned by Brandywine Village Associates (BVA), pending certain governmental approvals of Carlino’s development plans. Carlino attempted to develop that parcel as a shopping center with a Giant grocery store, and the BVA defendants actively opposed Carlino’s efforts to obtain the necessary government approvals. Carlino filed suit against the BVA defendants and attorney Paul Prince, who had represented BVA in its actions opposing Carlino’s development. 

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]