Gaming company Pace-O-Matic wants to expand its ongoing litigation against Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott by raising claims against two individual lawyers and arguing that the firm’s work with a Philadelphia-area casino has led to “ongoing breaches.”

Earlier this month, Pace-O-Matic, which is being represented by Myers, Brier & Kelly’s Daniel Brier, entered a motion for leave to file an amended complaint in the case, Pace-O-Matic v. Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]