The U.S. Supreme Court recently issued its long-awaited opinion in West Virginia v. EPA, significantly restricting the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) authority to combat climate change and regulate carbon emissions on a national scale. At issue in the case was the EPA’s authority to enact the Clean Power Plan (CPP), which included a nationwide mandate for power plants to shift energy sources from fossil fuels to natural gas and renewables.
Major Questions Doctrine
In a 6-3 opinion, authored by Chief Justice John Roberts, the court invalidated the CPP, holding that the EPA exceeded its statutory authority under §111(d) of the Clean Air Act in setting performance standards based on the power generation shifting system outlined in the CPP. The court invoked the “Major Questions Doctrine,” a scarcely used body of case law prohibiting agencies—except in “certain extraordinary circumstances”—from making “decisions of vast economic and political significance” without an express delegation of authority from Congress. West Virginia v. EPA, 142 S. Ct. 2587, 2605 (2022). The court reasoned that §111(d) of the Clean Air Act did not contain a clear delegation of power that would permit the EPA to “force a nationwide transition away from the use of coal[.]” Id. at 2616.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
