Vivian Sanks-King, whom the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey ousted as general counsel in 2005 to avoid a criminal prosecution, has no viable discrimination claim, a state appeals court says.
July 18, 2013 at 06:09 PM
1 minute read
Vivian Sanks-King, whom the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey ousted as general counsel in 2005 to avoid a criminal prosecution, has no viable discrimination claim, a state appeals court says.
Her forced resignation was a condition of a deferred-prosecution agreement with the U.S. Attorney's Office, which amounted to a "legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason," the Appellate Division held Thursday in Sanks-King v. UMDNJ, A-3050-11.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
