Just days before former hedge fund portfolio manager Mathew Martoma was charged with insider trading, a panel of insider trading experts was discussing the rise of cases, like Martoma’s, based on so-called expert networks.
That prescient discussion wrapped up a wide-ranging, day-long conference on Nov. 16 at Columbia University Law School, where practitioners, judges, professors and regulators discussed issues in insider trading that remain murky and often contentious 50 years after In The Matter of Cady, Roberts & Co., 40 S.E.C. 907 (1961), the landmark case that created modern insider trading law by holding that a person who obtains non-public information about a company must “disclose or abstain” from trading on it.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
