Contracts and subcontracts entered into in connection with construction projects often include insurance and additional insured requirements that create a web of obligations running between owners, general contractors, subcontractors and their insurers. These contractual provisions can lead to litigation over the right to coverage as well as priority of insurer obligations, including which insurance policy pays first. Last month, the  U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit weighed in on such a dispute, providing guidance with respect to competing other insurance provisions and additional insured clauses. See Amerisure Insurance v. Selective Insurance Group, No. 21-1516, 2023 WL 3311879 (2d Cir. May 9, 2023). In Amerisure v. Selective, the Second Circuit held that the subcontract terms governed the additional insured question while the other insurance clauses in the insurance policies governed the priority dispute.

The Construction Project and the Insurance Requirements

In connection with the construction of a movie theater, the owners of the project and the property entered into a contract with a general contractor. The general contractor then entered into subcontracts, including with a subcontractor engaged to perform masonry work.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]