By Jacqueline Thomsen | Amanda Bronstad | August 6, 2020
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed Senior U.S. District Judge Ellen Huvelle's decision, finding that the judge "got it just right."
By Jacqueline Thomsen | July 7, 2020
"Precluding public access because of the personnel-hours required to produce those records is no more warranted than precluding public access to high-profile trials because of the costs of crowd control," the court ruled.
By Jacqueline Thomsen | June 2, 2020
"If the question is whether there's been an adequate search, what difference does it make what the intent was or reasons for using a private server, or Hillary Clinton's or anyone else's understanding of State's record searching obligations?" Judge Robert Wilkins asked.
By Victoria Hudgins | October 18, 2019
In an effort to bring more transparency to government, Texas amended its public information law to close a loophole not accounting for personal devices. It's a move that advocates say other states should follow.
By Mike Scarcella | September 16, 2019
"We very much regret that this incident occurred and can assure the court that it will not happen again," Jones Day lawyers told a Virginia federal court.
By Victoria Hudgins | March 22, 2019
While the way Jared Kushner allegedly uses WhatsApp for government correspondence satisfies record-keeping laws, e-discovery experts caution that screenshots could be inadmissible as evidence.
By Victoria Hudgins | March 19, 2019
Harvard and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology joined forces to award $750,000 to seven organizations, including ones that help detect deepfakes and promote open access of government data.
By Jeff Cox, UniCourt | February 15, 2019
Contrasted with GDPR, CCPA sets a crucial distinction between personal information and publicly available information obtained from government records.
By Amanda Bronstad | January 25, 2019
Seven retired federal judges, including former Seventh Circuit Judge Richard Posner, filed an amicus brief in a class action over PACER fees now on appeal.
By Jason Grant | January 15, 2019
“Terrorism-related concerns cannot be used to justify the use of a Glomar response in every FOIL context,” Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Arlene Bluth wrote in her decision. She said that “the petitioners here are protestors, engaging in First-Amendment protected activity."
Presented by BigVoodoo
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.
Consulting Magazine identifies consultants that have the biggest impact on their clients, firms and the profession.
Company Description CourtLaw Injury Lawyers is an established Personal Injury Law Firm with its primary office located in Perth Amboy, New J...
Black Owl Recruiting is looking for a number of qualified applicants to fill positions for a highly reputable client. Recent experience work...
McManimon, Scotland & Baumann, LLC is seeking talented and motivated Associate Attorneys with 3-7 years of experience working closely wi...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS