Contract lifecycle management (CLM) systems are among of the most sought-after and implemented technologies in the past two years with dozens of solutions flooding the market. However, many companies that buy these technologies with great optimism and the best intentions often don’t reap the benefits or even make use of the technology’s full capabilities. Corporate legal, and the company’s other departments, may struggle to find value from their CLM system beyond just a glorified (and very expensive) filing cabinet for the company’s electronic contracts.

Clearly something is lost in translation during implementation which ultimately inhibits the full success of CLM projects for corporate legal departments. So what are the “disconnects” that keep legal from realizing the full value of a CLM system? Just as technology is not a silver bullet solving all ills, there is no one single answer to this question.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]