Two Dallas lawyers who litigated a groundbreaking case that allowed plaintiffs to pursue legal-malpractice cases in federal court are now embroiled in a suit of their own, pitting the former co-counsel against each other as plaintiff and defendant. Rogge Dunn, a partner in Dallas' Clouse Dunn, represents the plaintiff, who alleges that his former firm failed to pay bonuses owed to him.
December 05, 2011 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Two Dallas lawyers who litigated a groundbreaking case that allowed plaintiffs to pursue legal-malpractice cases in federal court are now embroiled in a suit of their own, pitting the former co-counsel against each other as plaintiff and defendant.
Chris Kling v. Paul Storm and Storm LLP was filed Nov. 21 in the 191st District Court in Dallas. In the petition, Kling alleges that Storm and Storm LLP failed between 2008 and 2009 to pay bonuses owed to him.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join General Counsel and Senior Legal Leaders at the Premier Forum Designed For and by General Counsel from Fortune 1000 Companies
The Texas Lawyer honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in Texas.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
