Perhaps no topic in recent no-fault practice has generated as much debate as the issue of what is necessary to satisfy a plaintiff assignee medical provider’s prima facie case.
Plaintiffs in no-fault practice, unlike any other area of New York practice, do not have a definitive answer as to what they must demonstrate to satisfy their prima facie case. This article attempts to discern what the different appellate courts have found constitutes a prima facie case, and whether there is a consensus within the courts as to this issue.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
