We applaud Judge Mary Jacobson’s decision, in Garden State Equality v. Dow, that same-sex couples must be allowed to marry in order to obtain equal protection of the law under the New Jersey Constitution. The decision is thorough, well-written and correct. Seven years ago, in Lewis v. Harris, the state Supreme Court held that the state constitution did not compel recognition of same-sex marriage. It made clear, however, that the rights of those in civil unions must be equal to those who are married and called on the Legislature to take appropriate action on this emotionally charged issue.

In response, the Legislature established the Civil Union Review Commission, which issued a report that the economic and psychological disadvantages of civil unions were substantial and that marriage equality was needed. The Legislature passed such a bill but the governor vetoed it, suggesting the matter should be submitted directly to the voters. An amendment to the state constitution was proposed, defining marriage as the legally recognized union of two persons of any gender, but the legislative majority leaders refused to submit it.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]