• McNeil v. Metzger

    Publication Date: 2020-03-25
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Connolly
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: D68924

    The court denied habeas corpus relief because petitioner voluntarily entered a guilty plea and he failed to demonstrate ineffec-tive assistance of counsel.

  • Genentech, Inc. v. Amgen Inc.

    Publication Date: 2020-03-25
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Pharmaceuticals
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Connolly
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael P. Kelly, Daniel M. Silver and Alexandra M. Joyce McCarter & English, LLP, Wilmington, DE
    for defendant: Daralyn J. Durie, Adam R. Brausa, Eric C. Wiener and Enenda Hoxha, Durie Tangri LLP, San Francisco, CA for Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope. Paul B. Gaffney, David I. Berl, Thomas S. Fletcher, Kyle E. Thomason, Teagan J. Gregory, Charles L. McCloud and Kathryn S. Kayali, Williams & Connolly LLP, Washington, DC; William F. Lee, Lisa J. Pirozzolo, Emily R. Whelan, Kevin S. Prussia, Andrew J. Danford, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Boston, MA; Robert J. Gunther Jr., Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, New York, NY; and Nora Passmaneck of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Denver, CO for Genentech, Inc. Melanie K. Sharp and James L. Higgins, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Neal C. Belgam, Eve H. Ormerod and Jennifer M. Rutter, Smith Katzenstein & Jenkins LLP, Wilmington, DE for Amgen Inc.

    Case Number: D68923

    The court relied on extrinsic evidence to construe a term relating to a fermentation process in this pharmaceutical patent case.

  • Goetz v. Voya Fin., Inc.

    Publication Date: 2020-02-19
    Practice Area: Consumer Protection
    Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Connolly
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Robert J. Kriner, Jr., Vera G. Belger, Chimicles & Tikellis LLP, Wilmington, DE; Steven A. Schwartz, Chimicles & Tikellis LLP, Haverford, PA; Franklin D. Azar, H. Zachary Balkin, Paul R. Wood, Jonathan S. Parrott, Franklin D. Azar & Associates P.C., Aurora, CO; Gordon W. Netzorg, Sherman & Howard LLC, Denver, CO for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Patricia R. Urban, Pinckney, Weidinger, Urban & Joyce LLC, Greenville, DE; James F. Jorden, Waldemar J. Pflepsen, Jr., W. Glenn Merten, Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath, Washington, DCs for defendants.

    Case Number: D68880

    Employee investment plan recordkeeper was not an Employee Retirement Income Security Act fiduciary in setting the fee schedule because it had no existing relationship with the plan or its participants, but had fiduciary duties in preparing regulatory disclosures.

  • James v. A.C. Moore Arts & Crafts, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2020-02-05
    Practice Area: Employment Litigation
    Industry: Retail
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Connolly
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Sharon M. James, pro se plaintiff.
    for defendant: Jennifer Gimler Brady and Jennifer Penberthy Buckley, Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendants.

    Case Number: D68865

    A judge's former representation of the law firm representing defendants was not by itself a basis for recusal.

  • Personal Audio, LLC v. Google, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2020-01-22
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Connolly
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Brian Farnan and Michael Farnan, Farnan LLP, Wilmington, DE; Douglas Hahn and Salil Bali, Stradling Yoc-ca Carlson & Rauth, P.C., Newport Beach, CA; Henning Schmidt, Minghui Yang, R. Floyd Walker, Victor Hardy and William Parrish, Hardy, Parish, Yang, LLP, Austin, TX for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Brian Egan and Jack Blumenfeld, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Antonia Sistos, Da-vid Perlson and Melissa Baily, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, San Francisco, CA for defendant.

    Case Number: D68850

    The court issued its claim construction order after hearing the parties' objections to the recommenda-tions of a magistrate judge.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    New York Attorney Discipline: Practice and Procedure 2024

    Authors: Hal R. Lieberman, J. Richard Supple, Jr., Harvey Prager

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • beIN Media Group LLC v. bein.qa

    Publication Date: 2020-01-08
    Practice Area: Trademarks
    Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Connolly
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Rodger D. Smith II, Michael J. Flynn, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Peter H. Kang, Ash Nagdev, Sidley Austin LLP, Palo Alto, CA; Theodore W. Chandler, Sidley Austin LLP, Los Angles, CA for plaintiff.
    for defendant: N/A

    Case Number: D68830

    Default judgment granted where party that had registered infringing internet domain had delayed resolution of the case by failing to comply with the terms of the parties' settlement agreement and failed to otherwise appear or file an answer in the action.

  • British Telecomm. plc v. Fortinet Inc.

    Publication Date: 2020-01-08
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Connolly
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Philip A. Rovner and Jonathan A. Choa, Potter, Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; James H. Shalek, Baldassare Vinti, Nolan M. Goldber, and Fabio E. Tarud, Proskauer Rose LLP, New York, NY for plaintiffs.
    for defendant: Jack B. Blumenfeld and Brian P. Egan, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; John Neukom and James Y. Pak, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Palo Alto, CA for defendant.

    Case Number: D68831

    Motion to dismiss on forum non conveniens grounds pursuant to an exclusive forum selection agreement denied where it was not clear that plaintiffs would be able to assert their U.S. patent infringement claims in the required foreign court.

  • McNeill v. Snow

    Publication Date: 2020-01-08
    Practice Area: Civil Rights
    Industry: Health Care | State and Local Government
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Connolly
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Dale Kevin McNeill, pro se plaintiff.
    for defendant: Ryan Patrick Connell,Delaware Dep’t of Justice, Wilmington, DE for defendant Wesley. Dana Spring Monzo and Karine Sarkisian, White & Williams, Wilmington, DE for defendant Connections CSP Inc.

    Case Number: D68834

    An inmate failed to adequately state a claim for violations of his civil rights, because the record did not show any personal in-volvement by the warden or any unlawful policy by a health care provider.

  • United States v. Dougherty

    Publication Date: 2020-01-01
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Connolly
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jeffrey A. Finucane, assistant United States attorney, Martinsburg, WV for plaintiff.
    for defendant: N/A

    Case Number: D68829

    Where defendant filed multiple incoherent motions, the court ordered a psychological evaluation to determine defendant's competency.

  • Super Interconnect Tech. LLC v. HP Inc.

    Publication Date: 2020-01-01
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Consumer Products | Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Connolly
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Brian Farnan and Michael Farnan , Farnan LLP, Wilmington, DE; Jeffrey Bragalone, Jonathan Rastegar and T. William Ken-nedy, Bragalone Conroy P.C., Dallas, TX for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Jack Blumenfeld and Jennifer Ying, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnel LLP, Wilmington, DE; Cory Davis, Theresa Weisenberger, Daniel Goettle and Jennifer Kurcz, Baker & Hostetler LLP, Atlanta, GA, Philadelphia, PA and Chicago, IL for defendant.

    Case Number: D68827

    Plaintiff failed to provide fair notice of how defendant's accused products directly infringed on plaintiff's patents, and because the court concluded plaintiff did not adequately allege direct infringement, it could not recover for induced infringement either.