Florida Supreme Court Building. (Credit: vasanth/Adobe Stock)
The Florida Supreme Court ruled that an attorney who sent a subpoena that was different from the one for which he’d provided notice must face a stiffer sentence for behavior that was “destructive to the legal system as a whole.”
The respondent, Odiator Arugu of the Florida Law Firm in Orlando, represented George Rodriguez in a divorce proceeding.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
