One of the great myths of the legal profession is that the attorney-client privilege promises absolute confidentiality to ensure clients’ full disclosure to their counsel. However, as most lawyers know too well, clients have a natural propensity to engage in self-protective selective disclosure, which may be justified given the many exceptions to the supposedly clear, certain and reliable rule and the vigor with which most counsel attack their adversaries’ invocation of the privilege.
In other words, the attorney-client privilege does not serve its stated purpose of promoting disclosure between client and counsel; does not provide certainty; and is costly to protect, frequently without real reason. The potholes have gutted the highway. It is time to replace this overburdened infrastructure. The need to protect work product developed in anticipation of litigation seems better grounded. It is relatively simple to apply, based solely on logistical and temporal concepts. Current protection, however, is not absolute.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
