In The Law Tribune front-page report entitled “Probate Chief Seeks More Muscle” (May 7, 2007), I was surprised to read that Probate Court Administrator James Lawlor could only give two reasons for his quest for more power.
When the General Assembly’s Program Review and Investigations Committee looked at Mr. Lawlor’s complaint that he lacked authority, the committee recommended the administrator and the Probate Assembly examine the issue of the administrator’s enforcement authority “for situations that do not rise to the level of formal referral to the Council on Probate Judicial Conduct.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
