In State v. Holmes, 334 Conn. 202 (2019), the Supreme Court expressly acknowledged the failure of Batson v. Kentucky to address the effects of implicit bias and the disparate impact that certain race neutral explanations for peremptory challenges have on minority jurors. As a consequence, the court announced that it would convene a jury selection task force to study racial discrimination in the selection of juries; to consider measures intended to promote the selection of diverse jury panels; and to propose necessary changes to the jury selection process in Connecticut, to be implemented by court rule or legislation.

Subcommittees were established, including one entitled Implicit Bias in the Jury Selection Process and Batson Challenges. That committee was chaired by judges Gold and Lavine, and together we studied the extensive body of work relating to implicit bias and its impact on the jury selection process. Recognizing that peremptory challenges would not be eliminated, this subcommittee studied all standards under Batson and whether in actual practice, Batson served to contribute to the implicit bias and discrimination it was intended to overcome.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]